PDA

View Full Version : London's Mary Poppins Sets Age Limits for Theatregoers


SorcererMickey
December 11th, 2004, 11:12
London's Mary Poppins Sets Age Limits for Theatregoers

By James Inverne
10 Dec 2004


Controversy has been whipped up around the new Mary Poppins musical with the front page of Britain’s Daily Mail declaring that the show’s organizers have just unveiled “a shock for the under-sevens.”

Producers Cameron Mackintosh and Disney’s Thomas Schumacher have been saying for months that their stage version of Mary Poppins is not simply a replica of the famous movie. Now, says the Mail, they’ve made that point abundantly clear by banning those under the age of three and recommending that parents should think twice before taking any child under the age of seven to see the show.

The decision was been taken because the show’s tone incorporates much from Pamela Travers’ books as well as the film. And, not only did Travers claim that her writing was aimed as much at grown-ups as at children, her books have far darker overtones than the Disney movie. The children go through some frightening experiences (in one story young Jane is tempted to join a scene in a porcelain bowl, only to find that its characters want to keep her trapped there forever), and Poppins herself is a stern nanny who unnerves her charges as much as they love her.

One scene in particular — which cannot be revealed until the show opens — is thought to have caused the decision as it might scare very young theatregoers. Not that the musical abandons the merry world of the film altogether — far from it. Many of the Sherman Brothers songs are still there, from "Feed the Birds" to "Spoonful of Sugar," albeit sometimes in different settings.

A source connected with the show told Playbill On-Line that the decision is neither new, nor unusual. Other shows, such as The Nutcracker at the London Coliseum and His Dark Materials at the National Theatre, also carry warnings. “We discovered from playing the show in Bristol that we had to put out guidelines,” says the source. “A lot of people think this is like the movie, which is only 90 minutes long and very suitable for very young children. The show is nearly three hours, and tiny little tots want to go out, they want to go to the toilet or to run around, and they cause mayhem for the rest of the audience. But the Mail has sensationalized the story; the guidelines have been on the website for ages, and anyone who phones the box office is advised about them.”

Any parents who have bought tickets for children under three will be given a full refund. For more information, call (0)870 850 9191.

Source: http://www.playbill.com/news/article/90056.html

:ears: :ears: :ears:

Mary Poppins Play Not For Kids

Whilst the Mary Poppins movie is a much-loved favourite for kids of all ages, under-threes have been banned from the new stage play - and all little ones under seven advised to stay away.

http://static.sky.com/images/pictures/1259276.jpg

The Disney movie, celebrating its 40th anniversary, is a U certificate, suitable for all ages - but the theatre show is said to be more faithful to the darker, scarier books.

Most performances at the Prince Edward Theatre in London's Soho have sold out until February, with many tickets thought to have been bought for children.

Advance box office sales have reportedly topped £12m.

Nick Allott, managing director of Cameron Mackintosh Ltd, the company behind the play. said the company had gone back to the source material, unlike the Chitty Chitty Bang Bang play, which recreates the film.

There were "undercurrents of a more serious message" within the books by Pamela Travers, "wonderful" though they were.

He added: "We are trying to be helpful rather than prescriptive.

"The theatre doesn't have a certification system, unlike the cinema. Therefore we think it is our responsibility to provide guidance to parents who may want to bring their families."

He also said children under three did not have the "attention span" to sit through a play of 2hrs45.

"They start wiggling, crying and wanting the toilet - all of which can upset other theatregoers who have paid up to £40 a ticket."

Source: http://www.sky.com/showbiz/article/0,,50001-1163565,00.html

dcfromva
December 11th, 2004, 14:57
SM,
Thanks for posting this. (I wish I could go see this show. :) )

-DC :ears:

OKWTink
December 11th, 2004, 15:05
Makes sense to me!

Ever read the original J.M. Barrie's version of Peter Pan? It ain't Disney.

marivigi
December 13th, 2004, 19:57
The Disney versions are ALWAYS better...

The Little Mermaid for example, I will pick Ariel marrying the price over becoming foam any day! :wink:

Thanks SM!

lisaw
December 13th, 2004, 20:14
We really wanted to see this show but when I looked into getting tickets the warnings are there so we thought better of it. May just have to go and see The Lion King again now :wink:

SorcererMickey
December 13th, 2004, 20:19
The Little Mermaid for example, I will pick Ariel marrying the price over becoming foam any day!


WHAT!!! :blink:

OKWTink
December 13th, 2004, 20:47
Ya' never read the original? :unsure:

SorcererMickey
December 13th, 2004, 22:26
no... :ohdear:

marivigi
December 13th, 2004, 23:46
ooops!

Well sorry for telling you the ending...

Note to self: Must learn not to write endings... :(

Brianb
December 14th, 2004, 14:41
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I was lucky enough to see the show on Saturday night (Dec 11th). It is magnificent - the sets and costumes are wonderful and there are some amazing special effects.

The leads were very faithful to the film, and there were some wonderful nostalgic touches, especially in the costumes. However, as this version draws from all of PL Travers books there are numerous new characters to enjoy.

The one number in the show - "Temper Temper" (which I must admit wasn't my favourite) - is certainly the one that would cause nightmares for tiny tots. It takes place in the children's bedroom and features all their unwanted toys coming to life and being rather cruel and nasty to the kids. I thought it was quite unnecessary.

Having said that, 98% of the show is magnificient. There are some extremely memorable new songs, and some wonderful new interpretations of the classics from the film - especially "Jolly Holiday" when park statues come to life, and the show-stopping "Supercalifragilistic" which is a real tonge twister for the cast.

I won't say too much about the magical special effects as they really make the show - and are brilliant in their staging. You never see them coming.

I had an absolute ball at the show. We were in wonderful seats in front of the dress circle and above the front stalls (which I thoroughly recommend) - especially when Mary Poppins flies from the stage and comes to within inches of your face.

Bert was a real find in Gavin Lee - in fact everything was exceptional and I can't wait to see it again.

Please go and see the show if you get the opportunity. There's nothing to beat live theatre.

Brianb

:lol: :lol: :lol:

SorcererMickey
December 14th, 2004, 16:03
Oh, so glad you liked it. Are you buying my ticket to go see it :D .

Brianb
December 14th, 2004, 18:35
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Hi Sorceror,

Of course I'll buy your ticket - just give me six months notice. Just joking - I hear they've taken £16 million in advance sales, so there might be a long wait.

Hopefully it will play the US before too long.

Brianb

:lol: :lol: :lol: